Why Code Coverage is Essential for Modern Development
Code coverage metrics are crucial for maintaining software quality and ensuring comprehensive testing across your codebase
In today's fast-paced development environment, code coverage tools have become indispensable for teams striving to deliver high-quality software. These tools help developers identify untested code paths, measure test effectiveness, and maintain confidence in their codebase. Whether you're building enterprise applications or open-source projects, comprehensive code coverage reporting ensures that critical functionality is properly tested before reaching production.
When choosing between code coverage platforms, development teams must consider factors beyond basic functionality. Privacy requirements, team scalability, pricing models, and integration capabilities all play crucial roles in the decision-making process. For organizations handling sensitive code or intellectual property, finding a code coverage solution that respects privacy while maintaining robust feature sets becomes paramount.
Quality Assurance
Identify untested code paths and ensure critical functionality is properly tested before production
Measure Effectiveness
Track test coverage metrics across your entire codebase to maintain confidence as you ship
Privacy Matters
Organizations with sensitive code need solutions that respect privacy while delivering powerful analytics
Quick Overview
Both platforms use similar per-repository pricing models, but with different approaches
OtterWise
- Privacy-first: No code access required
- Per-repository pricing from $10/mo for 2 repos
- Unlimited team members
- Bootstrapped & independent
Coveralls
- Established platform
- Per-repository pricing: from $10/mo for 1 repo
- Unlimited team members
- 30+ CI integrations
Feature Comparison
Detailed comparison of key features and capabilities
Feature | OtterWise | Coveralls |
---|---|---|
Public Repositories |
Unlimited (Free)
|
Unlimited (Free)
|
Private Repositories | From $10/month (2 repos) | From $10/month (1 repo) |
Team Members | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Code Access Required |
No
|
Yes (typically) |
PR Comments |
Included
|
Included
|
Status Checks |
Included
|
Included
|
Line Annotations |
Included
|
Included
|
Data History |
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
API Access |
Included
|
Included
|
CI Integrations | GitHub Actions, CI-agnostic | 30+ integrations |
Type Coverage |
Included
|
Not available |
Mutation Testing |
Included
|
Not available |
Company Type | Bootstrapped | VC-backed |
Pricing Comparison
See how costs scale with your repository needs
1 private repo
2 private repos
15 private repos
Choosing the Right Code Coverage Platform for Your Team
Understanding the key differences between code coverage solutions helps make an informed decision
Selecting the right code coverage platform requires careful consideration of your team's specific needs and constraints. Both OtterWise and Coveralls offer competitive per-repository pricing models, but they differ significantly in their approach to privacy, feature sets, and company philosophy. The ideal solution should provide comprehensive coverage metrics while respecting your organization's security requirements and development workflow.
One of the most significant differences between these platforms is their approach to code privacy. Coveralls, being an established platform, typically requires access to your source code to provide detailed coverage analysis. This approach works well for many open-source projects but may present challenges for organizations working with proprietary code, financial systems, or healthcare applications. OtterWise's privacy-first design ensures that your code remains completely private while still delivering comprehensive coverage metrics and insights.
When it comes to features and pricing, both platforms offer competitive per-repository pricing starting at $10 per month. OtterWise includes advanced features like type coverage tracking and mutation testing support, which are not available in Coveralls. These features provide deeper insights into your code quality and help identify potential issues that traditional coverage tools might miss. Coveralls provides support for Bitbucket and GitLab, while OtterWise currently focuses on GitHub integration.
Key Pricing Insight
Both platforms start at the same price point and scale similarly with private repository count.
OtterWise Tiers
Coveralls Tiers
What to Consider
Key factors when choosing a code coverage platform
Budget & Scaling
Compare per-repository pricing models and consider how costs scale as your project portfolio grows.
Privacy & Security
For sensitive codebases, choose solutions that don't require full source code access while still delivering comprehensive metrics.
Advanced Features
Consider type coverage, mutation testing, and other advanced features that provide deeper code quality insights.
Why OtterWise?
Built for modern development teams who value privacy, advanced features, and predictable costs
Privacy First
No source code access required. Track comprehensive coverage metrics while your code stays completely private.
Better Scaling
Tiered pricing becomes more cost-effective as you grow, unlike linear per-repository pricing.
Advanced Analytics
Type coverage and mutation testing provide deeper insights into code quality beyond traditional coverage metrics.
Sustainable & Independent
Bootstrapped and profitable. Our pricing stays predictable because we're driven by great service, not investor demands.
Note
Comparison based on publicly available information as of October 4, 2025.
Please contact us with any corrections.